The United States accused on Syria options or limited military intervention will carefully consider

After the ending of the U.S. presidential election, the Syrian crisis again put on the foreign policy agenda of the United States. Obama second term will be how to deal with the Syrian crisis? Whether to provide weapons directly to the Syrian armed opposition or massive sending troops to Syria? Some analysts pointed out, the Obama administration is "quietly" re-examine its involvement in the Syria conflict options. This will lead to changes in the strategic unknowable. But analysts believe that the United States must be considered to provide more support for Syria opposition, or even take a "limited" military action.

Reuters November 12 Journal article said that the U.S. current and former officials said, President Obama and his advisers is very cautious. Even if the general election pressure has passed, and still can not imagine that the United States would send troops to a large scale. Help get rid of the former Libyan leader Muammar Gaddafi, the kind of more limited but sustained bombing campaign is not on the table, at least for the time being.

However, the support of the United States more involved in Syria conflict, said the United States must be considered to provide more support for Syria opposition, or even to take a "limited" military action.

The Obama administration said the armed Syria opposition might make things worse. However, the article pointed out that nothing will no longer be viable. Syria death toll rose at the same time, there are more and more indications that the war also neighbors to become unstable, especially in Lebanon, Iraq, Turkey and Jordan.

"I am surprised that people soon after the election to talk about Syria," Joseph • Holliday, a former U.S. military intelligence officer, said, "I think, some people think that the omission itself is an option but we restraint longer, things change the more worse, "a senior U.S. government official claimed that:" we have been reviewing options. "he said, the White House against direct armed Syria opposition stance has not changed.

The article points out that some senior U.S. officials, such as the U.S. ambassador to the UN Rice allegedly more support for Syria to take a big move. U.S. military and intelligence agencies are very reluctant. Obama himself showed little interest also adopt a new diplomatic intervention. The some key ally of the United States still reluctantly. The British Sources said British officials have also been re-examine their options on Syria, but this week, they retreat on the recommendations of an armed opposition or to relax the EU arms embargo. France also yet to deliver on the promise of providing air defense weapons.